Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric-modulated arc therapy treatment plans

Salari, E.; Shuai Xu, K.; Sperling, N.N.; Parsai, E.I.; Salari, E; Shuai Xu, K; Sperling, N.N; Parsai, E.I

Home

>

Section

>

Chapter

Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric-modulated arc therapy treatment plans

Salari, E.; Shuai Xu, K.; Sperling, N.N.; Parsai, E.I.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 24(2): E13824

2023

ISSN/ISBN: 1526-9914

PMID: 36495010

Accession: 080716060

Full-Text Article emailed within 1 workday

Payments are secure & encrypted

Summary

This study aims to develop an algorithm to predict gamma passing rate (GPR) in the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. A total of 118 clinical VMAT plans, including 28 mediastina, 25 head and neck, 40 brains intensity-modulated radiosurgery, and 25 prostate cases, were created in RayStation treatment planning system for Edge and TrueBeam linacs. In-house scripts were developed to compute Modulation indices such as plan-averaged beam area (PA), plan-averaged beam irregularity (PI), total monitor unit (MU), leaf travel/arc length, mean dose rate variation, and mean gantry speed variation. Pretreatment verifications were performed on ArcCHECK phantom with SNC software. GPR was calculated with 3%/2 mm and 10% threshold. The dataset was randomly split into a training (70%) and a test (30%) dataset. A random forest regression (RFR) model and support vector regression (SVR) with linear kernel were trained to predict GPR using the complexity metrics as input. The prediction performance was evaluated by calculating the mean absolute error (MAE), R2 , and root mean square error (RMSE). RMSEs at γ 3%/2 mm for RFR and SVR were 1.407 ± 0.103 and 1.447 ± 0.121, respectively. MAE was 1.14 ± 0.084 for RFR and 1.101 ± 0.09 for SVR. R2 was equal to 0.703 ± 0.027 and 0.689 ± 0.053 for RFR and SVR, respectively. GPR of 3%/2 mm with a 10% threshold can be predicted with an error smaller than 3% for 94% of plans using RFR and SVR models. The most important metrics that had the greatest impact on how accurately GPR can be predicted were determined to be the PA, PI, and total MU. In terms of its prediction values and errors, SVR (linear) appeared to be comparable with RFR for this dataset. Based on our results, the PA, PI, and total MU calculations may be useful in guiding VMAT plan evaluation and ultimately reducing uncertainties in planning and radiation delivery.

Using machine learning to predict gamma passing rate in volumetric-modulated arc therapy treatment plans

Salari, E.; Shuai Xu, K.; Sperling, N.N.; Parsai, E.I.

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 24(2): E13824

2023

Full-Text Article emailed within 1 workday

Summary

References