Learning from what went wrong--two case studies

Grotefendt, R.H.; Chastain, J.W.

Journal of Hazardous Materials 115(1-3): 115-118

2004


ISSN/ISBN: 0304-3894
PMID: 15518972
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.05.005
Accession: 049459367

Full-Text Article emailed within 0-6 h
Payments are secure & encrypted
Powered by Stripe
Powered by PayPal

Summary
Safer design of process equipment can protect against unexpected events. Two case studies involving the design of a process vessel and the subsequent events will be reviewed. One case study will show how the original design minimized equipment damage from an operational error, and how additional safeguards will prevent recurrence. The second case study will show that over time small process changes can lead to an unexpected chemical reaction that results in a vessel rupture. We will also cover the additional safeguards added to prevent recurrence.

Learning from what went wrong--two case studies